نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت راهبردی پدافند غیرعامل دانشگاه و پژوهشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و تحقیقات راهبردی
2 استاد دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر
3 استادیار دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces stressed, in the statement of the second phase of the Revolution, the need to erupt the fountain of science and cross the current frontiers of knowledge.
Achievement of this important goal in the field of defense requires a model that explains the components affecting defense knowledge management and their relationship, with a systemic approach. Therefore, the questions of the current research were formulated in a form to make the aims of the research possible. The conceptual model made within the theoretical framework was designed based on library studies and the ideas of the scholars. The questionnaire was produced relying on the components of the model and it was distributed through a snowball process. The final model of the research was evaluated using Structural Equation Modeling. The values of the Factor Loading of the selected variables (6 microsystems, 21 mega-dimensions and 57 principal components) indicate the desirability of the components and the resulting path coefficients confirm the relationship between them. Finally, some suggestions have been made for IRI Armed Services based on the results of the research.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
فهرست منابع:
- Ahuja, Gautam, 2000. CollaborationN etworks, Structural Holes, and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 45, No. 3 (Sep., 2000)
- Almann, Lauri (2003), Eesti riigikaitse juhtimine, Tallinn: Eesti Kaitseministeerium
- Burk, James (2002), “Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations,” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7–29.
- Cottey, Andrew, Edmunds, Timothy and Forster, Andrew (eds.) (2002a), Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe: Guarding the Guards, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Feaver, Peter (1996), “The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control,” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 23, no. 2
- Hagelin, Björn. 2004. ‘Science- and Technology-Based Military Innovation: the United States and Europe’, SIPRI Yearbook 2004, Oxford, OUP
- Janowitz, Morris (1960/1971), The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait, New York, NY: Free Press.
- Kaldor, Mary (2006), New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Lindberg, Leon N.,The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration ( Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963 ).
- Meri, Lennart (2000), President of the Republic on the Opening Session of the Riigikogu
- Moskos, Charles C., Williams, J. A. and Segal, David (eds.) (2000), The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces After the Cold War, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Maigre, Merle ‘Theories of Civil Military Relations’, Akadeemia, september 2009, International Centre for Defence Studies, Tallin, Estonia.
- Schiff, R. (1995), “Civil-Military Relations Reconsidered: A Theory of
- Concordance,” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 22, no. 1,.
- B.Vagada(2012), springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. [1] Globalisation and Convergence: Drivers and Strategic Outsourcing,2012
- Wim Van Eekelen,"Turkish Civil-Military Relations and the EU: preparation for continuing Convergence" November 2005
)
