Network - centric strategic control model for defensive industries of Islamic republic of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Management, Faculty of Imam Hussein University (PBUH)

2 Doctor of Strategic Management, Higher National Defense University

3 Professor of Strategic Management, Faculty Member of Malek Ashtar University of Technology

4 Associate Professor of Management, Faculty Member of Malek Ashtar University of Technology

Abstract

Using the capabilities of research and development in the country in the form of cooperation networks, as the approach of "core - network", one of the most important approaches to defense industry to meet and adapt to rapid and enormous environmental changes and needs ahead and that it convert from a centralized hierarchical organization to an organization's key core and deep widespread relationships with National centers. But the lack of a comprehensive and integrated pattern control between defense industry and network of national partners, causes the lack of the stable and secure relationship among them. The continuation of this situation may damage the stability, security and success of defense industry cooperation with the National section. This research has developed literature of management and control theory department of defensive, and to define the most important factors influencing successful interaction with colleagues national, the evolution of the current state of strategic control in the defense industry and create suitable background for the coordination and synergy between defense industry management and  surveillance  bodies.This Research has been done to achieve strategic control of defense industries according to network approach and extensive cooperation with national partners. This study was conducted to answer this question that "what are the factors and components of strategic control of network-centric defense industries?" And in terms of the goal and nature; descriptive, considering the results and achievements; applied- development and in terms of  method; mixed. We have used a documentary method to achieve the main aspects of the network-centric strategic control of defense industries, a survey and interview with experts to complete and validate the model, and factor analysis to test it. 140 senior managers from industrial, research organizations of ministry of defense of Islamic republic of Iran were involved in study statistical analysis. The Sample size was determined by 104 people according to Morgan's Table.
The questionnaire was designed with 30 question about variables and the conceptual model was designed by 5 factors and 20 components. Experts confirmed Formal and content validity of questionnaire and it's stability was confirmed by Cronbach' Test. Data was analyzed by using interview and questionnaire was analyzed by using content analysis , descriptive statistical techniques( Frequency, frequency percentage ,cumulative frequency and histograms chart) and deduction statistical techniques (Factor analysis, mean comparison test with constant, Friedman test, Kolmogorov-Asmirnov test, binomial test).
The results indicate that internal renewal of defense industries factor with 4 components place in rank 1, results and strategic goals of defense industries factor place in rank2 with 4 component, strategic assumptions and strategic dynamic place in rank 3 with 4 components, cooperation capacity of defense industries factor places in rank4 and finally ability of defense industries factor places in  5 rank .

Keywords

References

 
فهرست منابع:
منابع فارسی:
- سبحان اللهی،محمدعلی،رحمان سرشت،حسین،اصلی بیگی، فرزانه(1391)، الگوی تعامل استراتژیک در شرکت های هلدینگ، فصلنامه مطا لعات مدیریت راهبردی، شماره 12
- بوشهری، علیرضا، نظری زاده، فرهاد(1387)، روندهای راهبردی جهانی مؤثر بر دفاع وصنایع دفاعی، تهران، مؤسسه آموزشی وتحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی
- پیرس، جان ای، رابینسون، ریچارد بی(1392)، مدیریت راهبردی؛ تدوین، پیاده سازی و کنترل، ترجمه: محمدحسین بیرامی، ویرایش دوازدهم، تهران، انتشارات سازمان مدیریت صنعتی
- حوزه نوآوری اندیشه دفاعی(1393)، چالش‌های اساسی همکاری صنایع دفاعی وهمکاران دفاعی، مؤسسه آموزشی وتحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی
- خاشعی، وحید، حسینی، سید محمود، حاجی کریمی، عباسعلی، رضاییان، علی، لشکربلوکی، مجتبی(1391)، کاوشی برالگوی کنترل راهبردی سازمانی؛ رویکردی کارکردگرایانه ونمونه ای آرمانی، اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، سال ششم، شماره اول، شماره پیاپی 11
- رحمان سرشت، حسین(1385)، راهبردهای مدیریت، تهران، نشر فن وهنر
- سامونس، پیتر( 1385)، برون‌سپاری تحقیق و توسعه، تهران، موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه امام حسین(ع)
- کاپلان، رابرت اس، نورتن، دیوید پی(1391)، سازمان راهبرد محور، ترجمه: پرویز بختیاری، چاپ دوازدهم، تهران،انتشارات سازمان مدیریت صنعتی
- کاکرن، ویلیام گمل(1388)، تکنیک های نمونه گیری، ترجمه عباس صالح اردستانی و محمدرضا سعدی، تهران، نشر اتحاد
- کاملی، محمدجواد، الوانی، سیدمهدی(1389)، شبکه‌ها وخط مشی گذاری عمومی، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه علوم انتظامی
- گروه مطالعاتی مدیریت راهبردی (1389)، الگوی کنترل راهبردی در سطح ملی، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی
- لورنژ، پیتر، اسکات مورتن، مایکل.اف، گوشل، سومانترا(1385)، کنترل استراتژیک، ترجمه سیدمحمد اعرابی، چاپ دوم، تهران، دفتر پژوهش های فرهنگی
- مرتضوی، مهدی، نوشمند، محمداسماعیل، مالکی، محمدرضا(1390)، مدیریت راهبردی عملکرد، چاپ اول، تهران، مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی
- هچ، ماری (1385)، تئوری سازمان: مدرن، نمادین تفسیری و پست مدرن، ترجمه: حسن دانایی فرد، جلد اول، تهران، نشر افکار
منابع انگلیسی:
-       Alexnder L. D. (1985), successfully implementing strategic Decisions. Long Range planning, No. 18, PP. 91 – 97    
-       Argiyris. C. (1986), sungle-Loop and pouble-loop models in research on Decision making, Administrative Science quarterly, management control systems six Edition, Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, PP. 363 – 375
-       Bozeman and J Dietz (2001), ‘Strategic research partnerships: constructing policy-relevant indicators’, Journal of  Technology Transfer, 4, 26 October, pages 385–393.
-       Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., and Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel  perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 795- 817
-       Carbonara N., Giannoccaro I., and Pontrandolfo P (2002), Supply chains wIThin industrial districts: a theoretical framework, International Journal of Production Economics, v.76, p. 159–176.
-       Dos, T., Teng, Bing-Sheng, (2000).Aresource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26, 31– 61.
- - Fawcett SB, VT Francisco, A Paine-Andrews, JA Schultz.(2000) “A model  memorandum of collaboration: a proposal” Public Health Reports 115(2-3), pages 174-9.
-       Gardener E. P. M (1985), A system Approach to bank prudential Management and supervision the untie lionization and feed back control, Journal of management studies No. 22, PP. 1 – 24
-       George, G., Zahra, S.A., Wood, D.R., (2002). The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17 (6), 577– 609
-       Goldsmith S., Eggers William D. (2004); Governing by network: The new shape of the public Sector; Washington D. G.: The Brooking Institution.
-       Hong. T,( 2007),A comparative analysis of supply chain management      practices by boeing and airbus: Long-Term strategic implications, Departmant of civil and engineering,MS at  Massachusetts institiute of technology.
-       Marques,L.,Ribeiro,J.A.,  Scapens, R.W.,(2011), The use of management control mechanisms by public organizations with a Network coordination role: A case study in the port industry, Management Accounting Research, 269-291
-       McGuire, M. (2002). Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5): 599-610.
-       Miralles B. R., (2001), A Study of Company Networks, Master Thesis, School of Engineering Jonkoping University/Sweden, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
-       Mollering,G.(2005),The Trust/coktrol dualITy: An integrative perspective on positive expectation of others, International Sociology, Vol.20,No.3,283-305
-       Ojasalo, J. (2004), “Key network management”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, pp. 195-204.
-       Okada, Y. and Kushi, T. (2004). Government-Sponsored cooperative research in Japan: A case study of the Organizational for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research (OPSR Program, OPIR Research Paper Series, No.22.
-       Poulymenakou, A. and Klein, S. (2006) Networks as orchestrations: Management in it-enabled inter-firm collaboration. In Managing dynamic networks (Klein, S. and Poulymenakou, A., Eds), pp 3-15, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
-       Preble, John. F,(1992),Towards A comprehensive system of strategic control  .Jornal of management studies 29:4 July,391-408  
-       Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J. (2007), Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of  Management 33(3): 479–516.
-       Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. (1995), A Preliminary Theory of Inter-organizational  Effectiveness :A Comparative Study of  Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1): 1-33.
-        Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. (2001), Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review 61(4): 414–23.
-       Riemer, K., & Klein, S. (2006), Network management framework. In S. Klein & A. Poulymenakou (Eds.), Managing dynamic networks (pp. 17-66). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
-       Schreyogg,George and Steinmann, Horst. (1987), Strategic control, A new Perspective, Academy of management Review, No. 12, PP. 91 – 103
-       Soderquist. K(1997), Instead tier model: product development organization and strategies in automotive expert supplier Firms, Doctor of Business Administration at Brunel University.
-       Tang. C, Zemmerman J, Nelson J,( 2009),Managing new product development and supply chain risks: the boeing 787 case, An international journal, VOL:10-N2
-       Tavakoli, Iraj & Perks, Keith J.,(2001), The development of a strategic control systemfor the management of strategic change, Strategic change, August, 297-305
-       Whitall,Debrareifman,(2007), Network analysis of a shared governance system, Portland state university
Strategic Defense Studies
Volume 14, Issue 64 - Serial Number 64
All articles in this issue are research.
August 2019
Pages 77-97

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics