The military doctrine is a modern-day agent in asymmetric wars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Political Science Department, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Instructor of Political Science Islamic Azad University

Abstract

Military doctrine play a crucial role at various levels (strategic, operational, and tactical) to describe and explain military approach of states such as how to mobilize and support involved forces, describe and illustrate the campaign, explain the best approaches to drive forces. Military doctrine with an agent centrality and approach is considered as the main core of forming practices of military operations on asymmetric warfare.
In this research, tried to have an antological approaching to agent-centered military doctrines phenomen and the functions of idealogy and social cultural context in it, on asymmetric warfare.
In this case two main questions are defined to initiate the research:
a-       What is the function of ideology factor in agen centered warfare?
b- What is the function of social cultural context factor in agent centered warfare?
According to phenomenology science and using mix method (qualitively & quantitively) employed professional’s opinion in final agreement.
Finally researcher introduce agent centered military doctrine as a phenomen, its main factors and transition journey strategies from ordinary paradigms, context, intrupter factors, to achieve desire outcome or to neutralizing it.

Keywords

References

الف) منابع فارسی:
- ایگلتون، تری،(1381)، «درآمدی بر ایدئولوژی»، ترجمه اکبر معصوم بیگی، تهران، آگاه
- بیتس، دانیل،(1370)، «انسان‌شناسی فرهنگی»، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، تهران، علمی
- دانش­آشتیانی، محمدباقر ،(1388)، «اصول تدوین دکترین نظامی»، مقاله­نامه نظم و امنیت انتظامی، شماره 7
- کرفلد، مارتین،(1386)، «بازاندیشی مفهوم جنگ»، ترجمه عبادا... حیدری، تهران، مرکز آینده‌پژوهی علوم و صنایع دفاعی
- مکنزی، کنت ،(1382)، «جنگ نامتقارن»، ترجمه عبدالمجید حیدری­،تهران، دافوس سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی
- نش، کیت ،(1387)، «جامعه­شناسی سیاسی معاصر»: جهانی‌شدن، سیاست و قدرت،ترجمه محمدتقی دلفـروز، تهران: کویر
- وبر، ماکس ،(1392)، «دین قدرت جامعه»،1392، ترجمه احمد تدین، تهران، هرمس
- هی، کالین،(1393)، «ساختار و کارگزار»، در: مارش، دیوید (و استوکر، جری)، روش  و نظریه در علوم سیاسى، ترجمه امیرمحمد حاجى یوسفى، تهران، مقاله‌کده مطالعات راهبردى وزارت امور خارجه
ب) منابع انگلیسی:
- Althusser, I.,1995, Ideology and Ideological state Apparatuges, (notes to ward investigation), in. Ziziek, S, mapping Ideology. London: verso
- Boyd, Jhon, col.,1982, Patterns of Conflict, US Airforce War college
- Corbin, J. &Strauss, A.,1998, grounded theory methodology, IN NK Denizn ays Lincoln(eds.)
- Guattari, Felix.,1987, A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia, Gilles Deleuze, The University of Minnesota
- Hay, C.,1995, Structure and Agency, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science. London: Macmillan
- Hegel.,1986, Wissenschaft der Logik II (= Hegel: Werke, Bd. 6, hrsg. von Eva Moldenhauer und Karl Markus Michel), Frankfurt am Main
- High, Marc A.,2008, Idea and Ontology. An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas , PennsylvaniaState University Press
- Robert, Henry.,2006, Robert's Rules of Order, (in Brief) Filiquarian Publishing, LLC
- Stepanova, E.,2008, Terrorism in asymmetrical conflict, SIPRI Report 23. Oxford University Press
- Vygotsky, L.S.,1978, Mind in Society, Harvard University Press
Strategic Defense Studies
Volume 16, Issue 73
All articles in this issue are research.
October 2018
Pages 47-62

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics